WHEN WOMEN TILT HISTORY
- Caleb Oladejo

- 6 hours ago
- 4 min read

There is something both remarkable and unsettling about the way Scripture records the influence of women. Not ornamental influence or decorative presence, but decisive moments — moments when the direction of a household, a throne, or even redemptive history itself tilted because a woman spoke, acted, intervened, or surrendered.
Yet this pattern is often handled carelessly.
Some men, reading the early pages of Genesis, see Genesis and stop at Eve. They trace the fall of man to her conversation with the serpent and conclude, quietly or loudly, that feminine counsel carries inherent danger. They move from Eve to Sarah giving Hagar to Abraham, and then to Rebekah orchestrating Jacob’s deception. The pattern appears, at first glance, troubling.
And from that selective reading a general suspicion is born: that the words of a woman must always be weighed with caution, perhaps even dismissed. And trust me when I say this, there are Christian men out there who already quietly carry this mindset "A woman's words should not be trusted", and because of this they miss out from the riches of wisdom and depth God has placed in women, especially in their wife.
But Scripture refuses to be reduced so simply.
The same sacred record that tells us about Eve also tells us about Abigail, who intercepted David at the brink of bloodshed and preserved his future kingship with wisdom and restraint. It tells us about Esther, whose courage altered imperial policy and safeguarded a covenant people. It tells us about Deborah, who judged Israel and ushered in decades of peace. It tells us about Bathsheba, remembered by many only for scandal, yet instrumental in securing Solomon’s throne when the ambition of Adonija threatened to fracture the kingdom. And it tells us about Mary, whose quiet submission — “Be it unto me according to thy word” — became the doorway through which the Incarnation entered time.
The biblical witness is not one-dimensional. Influence flows in two directions.
It is true that Sarah’s impatience complicated history. It is true that Rebekah’s strategy fractured her household. It is true that Solomon’s wives bent his heart toward idolatry. But it is equally true that without Abigail, David might have stained his destiny; without Esther, a people might have perished; without Bathsheba’s timely courage, the succession might have descended into chaos.
And let me connect some abstract thoughts here; if Bathsheba never preempted Adonija and moved quickly to notify David, Solomon might never become king. If Solomon never became king, we may never have the great temple built by Solomon, the Proverbs.
The real issue, then, is not gender. It is alignment.
Influence in Scripture is never neutral. It either bends a life toward obedience or pulls it away. It either harmonizes with divine timing or strains against it. The problem was never that Eve spoke, nor that Sarah suggested, nor that Rebekah acted. The problem was that in those moments, their influence operated outside patient trust. And equally, the glory of Abigail and Esther was not merely that they were women of action, but that their action aligned with covenant fidelity.
What is often forgotten in conversations shaped by fear is that the men involved were not passive victims. Adam received the command before Eve was formed. Abraham heard the promise before Sarah offered Hagar. Solomon knew the law concerning foreign alliances before he multiplied wives. To generalize female influence as inherently dangerous is to ignore male responsibility entirely.
Marriage, in Scripture, is not merely companionship. It is shared destiny. A wife does not simply live beside a man; she leans into his life, and he into hers. Over time, their convictions intermingle, their fears echo, their faith strengthens or weakens in tandem. History is shaped quietly at dinner tables long before it is shaped on thrones.
This is why the matter whom to marry demands prayer, not prejudice.
A man does not protect himself by distrusting women categorically. He protects himself by seeking a woman whose heart is turned toward God. The difference between Solomon’s decline and David’s preservation in the wilderness was not the existence of feminine influence. It was the direction of that influence.
One tilted a king toward idols. Another restrained a future king from folly. Influence is powerful. It always has been. It always will be.
To deny that women have shaped history is to ignore the text of Scripture itself. To claim that such influence is inherently suspect is to read the Bible selectively. The wiser posture is humbler: to recognize that any voice we allow near our heart — male or female — carries weight.
The prayer, then, is not for distance, but for discernment. Discernment, that as a man, God would give you a woman whose words steady faith rather than erode it. For a marriage where counsel deepens obedience rather than competes with it. For influence that bends history toward God’s purposes rather than away from them.
Women have leaned into history before. Some leaned with anxiety and left fractures behind. Others leaned with faith and left redemption in their wake.
The difference was never their femininity. It was their alignment. If you're not yet married, I pray that God will give you a woman who will build you toward God, not breakdown the pillars of your relationship with God. If you are already married, I pray the mercy of God will grace your home.



Comments